Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
- From: Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: glademm <glademm-list gnome org>, Paul Elliott <pelliott io com>
- Subject: Re: [glade--] Could raw C++ pointers be eliminated?
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:15:29 +0200
Murray Cumming schrieb:
Yes, RefPtr<> is not a general purpose smartpointer. But there are plenty
of other general purpose smartpointers that can be used with gtkmm.
So (if I read correctly between the lines) you advise me to use
auto_ptr<> inside the ctor (and the class)?
Not that I'm opposed to it ...
Christof
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
