[Glade-devel] please help: bug: glade2 file conversion to glade3 failed

[tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com (Tristan Van Berkom)]

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Saku Masukita
<sakumasukita at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
> <tristan.van.berkom at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Saku Masukita
> > <sakumasukita at googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dont care about that warning, its a missing translation and has nothing
> > to do with loading your project.
>
> Thank you Tristan,
>
> > What version of Glade do you have ? try the latest tarball
> > from ftp.gnome.org (3.6.7).
>
> In fact I have upgraded to the latest version of Ubuntu (9.10) and
> glade (alias glade-3) comes installed (there is no glade-2) but after
> commenting out the aforementioned line I can load everything now
> but still have that horizontal/vertical problem you mentioned.
>
> > Does it crash before or after firing a bunch of runtime warnings about
> > GtkCList ?
>
> No it does not crash now that I have the latest version.
> I just get several warnings.
>
> > > > needed for the icon definitions and Glade
> > > > ? ?did not crash - for your app to look normal;
> > >
> > > I see several GtkImage instances in the glade file. Are these the
> > > icon definitions you are referring to?
> >
> > I know, Glade 2 does not output that property, cause its new, its new and
> > introduced broken.
>
> Too bad that such property was introduced broken.
> Do you foresee that in future versions such conversion
> problem would be fixed?

The easiest fix would be in GTK+, to fix it from a conversion
could be possible from Glade, i.e. we could make the rude assumption
that any libglade file is broken and "fix" it on the way into GtkBuilder;
that would not solve the problem of any GtkBuilder files that were
created before the GTK+ version introducing GtkOrientable (which is
the other half of the problem at hand).

I cant speak for when that bug will be fixed in GTK+, I did not submit
a patch myself, although such a patch would be arguably easy to write.

Cheers,
        -Tristan