Re: [Gimp-web] "Free Software" vs. "Open Source"
- From: Pat David <patdavid gmail com>
- To: Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre prokoudine gmail com>, gimp-web-list <gimp-web-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-web] "Free Software" vs. "Open Source"
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:44:29 +0000
I prefer the original as well. Unless there's a compelling argument for
changing it, I'll leave it as is.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:38 AM Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre prokoudine gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Pat David wrote:
Referring to this bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758510
Should I change the lead description text to just "The Free Software
Image
Editor"?
Aren't "software" and "editor" mutually exclusive in this case?
Anyway, I don't see what's wrong with "The Free & Open Source Image
Editor". It uses the word "free", and the "open source" bit serves
nicely as an explanation what kind of free it is.
If purists have a problem with that, I dare say they might go ahead
and create a free gnu whatever image editor of their own. Godspeed
with that.
Alex
_______________________________________________
gimp-web-list mailing list
gimp-web-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]