[Gimp-user] Email for Dark Refraction?
- From: scott092707 aol com
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: [Gimp-user] Email for Dark Refraction?
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 16:13:49 -0400
Hi.
I use GIMP 2.8.16 on Lubuntu 16.04 LTS. (No doubt when 16.10 is available and I install it, I will have
2.8.18 available)
I ALSO use Dark Refraction's nightly builds 2.9.x versions for Windows, used through WINE,
as I sometimes want a feature not available in the 2.8 series.
(I have both, because I need to be able to use GIMP, and If I only have the unstable version, and it crashes,
then I would
either have nothing to use, or would have to un-install it, and install the stable version, just to edit a
photo...)
However, the last two times I have been able to download versions (DR has sometimes been unavailable for long
stretches)
the program fails with:
scott@scott-Asus-M2N68-AM-Plus:~$ wine /data/scott/Downloads/gimp-dev-i686-2016-08-02/bin/gimp-2.9.exe
wine: Call from 0x7bc4cf69 to unimplemented function libstdc++-6.dll._ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev, aborting
err:module:attach_process_dlls "libexiv2.dll" failed to initialize, aborting
err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for
L"Z:\\data\\scott\\Downloads\\gimp-dev-i686-2016-08-02\\bin\\gimp-2.9.exe" failed, status 80000100
scott@scott-Asus-M2N68-AM-Plus:~$ wine /data/scott/Downloads/gimp-dev-i686-2016-10-15/bin/gimp-2.9.exe
wine: Call from 0x7bc4cf69 to unimplemented function libstdc++-6.dll._ZNSt8ios_base4InitC1Ev, aborting
err:module:attach_process_dlls "libexiv2.dll" failed to initialize, aborting
err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for
L"Z:\\data\\scott\\Downloads\\gimp-dev-i686-2016-10-15\\bin\\gimp-2.9.exe" failed, status 80000100
I have no problem with the 2.9.3 version that is dated 2015-12-02.
I have wanted to submit a bug-report for this, but I have had no luck in finding a place to do this.
I have searched in vain for an email for DR, so that at least I could email him/her/them with the above issue.
Does anyone know how to contact DR?
-Scott
P.S. Obviously, I would also be interested in hearing if anyone knows what the above error means, and
especially if there is a
"quick fix" for it...
P.P.S. Meanwhile, I suppose I will look into trying to get the latest Windows stable unstable (!) 2.9
series, which I believe is 2.9.4...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]