Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp-developer] Test images and test suite (was Re: GIMP should fork babl and GEGL)
- From: Elle Stone <ellestone ninedegreesbelow com>
- To: gimp-developer-list gnome org, "gimp-user-list gnome org" <gimp-user-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp-developer] Test images and test suite (was Re: GIMP should fork babl and GEGL)
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:01:57 -0500
On 11/13/2014 10:02 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
I do have access to a x-rite color checker which should be in a
reasonably good condition (it is slightly older but has been stored in
the dark).
I could try to set up a colorful scene and shoot it in RAW with my
Nikon D40. Would this be of any help?
Yes. A colorchecker is very often found in composite test images. Given
the number of websites that post pictures of colorchecker charts,
hopefully there are no copyright restrictions on photographs of same.
(I am right now unsure about the correct lighting, there *should* be
some daylight neon tubes around, but I am at the moment unsure where
they are...)
You raise a good point. On the one hand, natural daylight on a sunny day
(D65ish) and direct morning and late afternoon/early evening sunlight
(D50ish) are wonderful full spectrum light sources that really bring out
colors. On the other hand, studio lighting is either iffy or expensive
and probably sometimes both (my own studio lighting is on the "cheap and
iffy" side).
Where I am sunlight is in short supply until spring, so it's studio
lighting or nothing. For flourescent and LED lighting, the fact that the
label says "daylight" is not very informative by itself. The other half
of the story is the CRI, "color rendering index"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_rendering_index). Anything 92 and
above is probably good enough.
Elle
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]