Re: [Gimp-user] suggestion for Gimp

[maderios <maderios gmail com>]

On 08/10/2013 12:15 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, maderios wrote:
>
> > > > Developers could offer two versions of Gimp:
> > > > - One version for amateurs with the gimp 2.8 behavior
> > > > - One version for professionals with the gimp 2.6 behavior that allows to
> > > > save files quickly and normally just like most free or commercial editors
> > > > images.
> > > > This would allow everyone to be satisfied
> > >
> > >
> > > Except for developers who would have to maintain two versions. But who
> > > cares about them, eh?
> > I think that both versions would not be very different, thus coding and
> > maintenance would be small. Another solution would consist in keeping single
> > Gimp but in proposing two possible configurations. Even approach  as for
> > both interfaces.
>
> I realize it might sound arrogant, but do you understand the meaning
> of the word "no"?

The word " no " exists only for the pessimists...  :-)
--
Maderios