Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-user-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 37
- From: Дзіковський Ваня <vanyasmart yandex ua>
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-user-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 37
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:50:31 +0200
PIMP - The Photoshop-like Image Manipulation Program
That one gets my vote, but only if the acronym can stand for
"Primary Image Manipulation Program." After all, the title should
be as accurately descriptive as possible.
IMO the idea that GIMP is somehow "chasing after" or "trying to be"
an Adobe product is very dangerous, and it comes straight from
Adobe's marketing department. I happen to LIKE the difference, and
by like I mean, the differences have a positive impact on my
productivity.
Does Gnome try to "be" the latest Microsoft or MAC desktop
interface? Does VLC try to "be" Windows Media Player, or Amarok
aspire to "be" iTunes? Do the users of these tools feel compelled
to name a commercial package that does roughly the same things every
time they mention the tool they DO use?
Fully agree with that. Includes word «Photoshop» in name is big self disrespect
My vote: leave it alone.
Also agree with you. However rebranding would not prevent.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]