Re: [Gimp-docs] [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:26:11PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:07:25AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi Roman -
when you talk about a "3.0" manual version in "3.0" - I am with the
impression that the purposed changes would take place before GIMP 3.0
itself (as the next version shall be 2.10)

So - it looks like the purposed version numbering would dissociate the
manual version from GIMP's version - is that so?  I think that might
be confusing - although on a second thought it could be
a manageable confusion, if it is clearly specified, inv arious places, that,
for example, gimp-help-2 "3.0" refers to "gimp-2.10" .

(As for the idea of going github I am of the same opinion as Jehan.
We could put a mirror ("fork" in github parlor) there - but the
authoritative repository
should, by the reasons listed and maybe some more,
be kept in the gnome infrastructure).

I too agree. IMHO gimp-help should follow the gimp versioning convention
for avoid confusion, i.e. the new gimp-help-2 should be gimp-2.10.
Cheers for spotting this. Yes it shoudl be 2.10.

Kind Regards
Roman Joost
email: romanofski gimp org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]