Re: [Gimp-developer] [ANNOUNCE] GIMP 2.10.20, babl 0.1.78, GEGL 0.4.24

Hello Øyvind,

On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:21:28 +0200 Øyvind Kolås <pippin gimp org> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 9:47 AM wwp <subscript free fr> wrote:
Is it normal if all files in babl and gegl sources archives are from
epoch origin (Jan 1 1970)?

Not sure if it's related, but ninja-build fails when I attempt to build
babl or gegl here (CentOS 7, ninja 1.7.2):
 ninja: error: manifest '' still dirty after 100 tries

A recursive `touch` in the sources tree did solve it.  

Not sure what is going on, maybe something is odd on your system - I
haven't heard
of such an issue before, and the tarballs themselves do seem fine:

$ tar tvf babl-0.1.78.tar.xz | tail -n3 ; tar tvf gegl-0.4.24.tar.xz | tail -n3
-rw-r--r-- pippin/pippin    950 2020-06-07 19:38 babl-0.1.78/tools/introspect.c
-rw-r--r-- pippin/pippin    518 2020-06-07 19:38 babl-0.1.78/tools/
-rw-r--r-- pippin/pippin   5941 2020-06-07 19:38
-rw-r--r-- pippin/pippin   14034 2020-06-07 21:11
-rw-r--r-- pippin/pippin   24479 2020-06-07 21:11
-rwxr-xr-x pippin/pippin    2701 2020-06-07 21:11

Well.. you're right, it seems that unpacking the archives using `mc`
goes with wrong file dates (using a plain `tar cJf` is fine). This is
the first time I encounter this issue, I'll see w/ the `mc` guys, maybe
something is specific with those babl/gegl archives, maybe it's a bug
on `mc`'s side or whatever.

The ninja error seems quite common when file date is "abnormal", anyway
I could workaround it. Thanks!



Attachment: pgpTU1xmz8cIX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]