Re: [Gimp-developer] Save/export, option to go back to old behaviour

[Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > Beyond that it's in the hands of community if they want the old
> > scenario back and maintain some sort of a fork.
> The performance of https://github.com/mskala/noxcf-gimp is somewhat
> underwhelming, so far.

It doesn't appear to be kept up, nor is it well-advertised. It'd be better
to have upstream do it.

> IMO we should revert back to the 2.0 look and feel, to finally fix all the
> horrible changes people have been complaining about for every past major
> release :)
> 
> Seriously, if all the changes in GIMP I was initially opposed to were
> reverted, the result would be something I could hardly use.

I think we can see *some* logical fallacies in your argument here.

Change is good. But listen to feedback as you make it. When there's a clear
use case, see if you can cover it without serious detriment to the rest.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org          <http://mattdm.org/>