Re: [Gegl-developer] npy saving operation

Ok. I commit it after slicing up the processing. Figured it might be a good exercise. :-)


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Øyvind Kolås <pippin gimp org> wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Dov Grobgeld <dov grobgeld gmail com> wrote:
Though I understand the implication, but as there are currently no readers that can deal with larger than RAM npy images, I suggest keeping the whole buffer approach for the first commit.

It is fine as a first commit, but the concern of not needing buffer-sized allocations is a general concern in GEGL, this isn't really a critical place; but dealing with it would be nice. :).

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]