Re: [Gegl-developer] Motion blur strange behavior

[Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre prokoudine gmail com>]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Victor Oliveira wrote:

> > And so, some tests:
> >
> > 1. OpenCL version of motion-blur:  1.0 s  (GeForce GT 430,   year 2012)
> > 2. CPU version of motion-blur:     >10 s  (Pentium 4 3.0GHz, year 2003)
> > 3. GIMP's old version motion blur: ~2 s (faster, much faster gegl's)
> >
> > 10x times faster. But my CPU significantly slower and older than GPU.
> >
> > In this case I hope GIMP will keep his fast (even if 8bit-per-color)
> > filters, sometimes speed is the main thing in image processing. Or
> > may be GEGL will have faster operations for 8-bit data?
>
> But that's the point of using the GPU! We can have good and awesome
> floating-point precision and speed :)

Since your reply landed to my inbox before the original mail, how was
CPU version measured?

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org