Re: [gdm-list] [systemd-devel] RFC: user session lifetimes vs. $DISPLAY
- From: "Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan h kok intel com>
- To: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity gmail com>
- Cc: systemd mailing list <systemd-devel lists freedesktop org>, gdm-list gnome org, Lennart Poettering <mztabzr 0pointer de>
- Subject: Re: [gdm-list] [systemd-devel] RFC: user session lifetimes vs. $DISPLAY
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:10:12 -0800
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity gmail com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Lennart Poettering <mztabzr 0pointer de> wrote:
On Mon, 18.02.13 11:08, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan h kok intel com) wrote:
For each login, you'd have an instance service (e.g.
gnome-session@:0.service) to serve that display.
Well, I am not convinced it is necessary to instantiate
everything. People can do that if they really really want to make things
work to allow one local user to run multiple sessions, but I am pretty
sure that should be out of scope for GNOME. GNOME components should just
be normal services that are started on the user bus and which find their
display from XDG_RUNTIME_DIR.
Hmm, could one set XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/$UID/second-session and
have multiple sessions that way?
How will X11 applications find the user bus then? or even systemd? I
doubt that will work.
Auke
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]