Re: gdm crash
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: David Seery <djseery btinternet com>
- Cc: gdm sunsite dk
- Subject: Re: gdm crash
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:38:06 +0000
[ccing the list again since it may be of interest to others]
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 01:28:45PM +0000, David Seery wrote:
> I had tried to be quite careful about testing previous versions before
> posting here, but it seems I made a mistake anyway. The problem is
> specific to 188.8.131.52; the 2.4.4.x branch works properly. Perhaps I had
> old configuration files lying around when I tested these last time.
Ahh, ok, good.
> In any event, I have this problem with an out-of-the-box build of
> 184.108.40.206 from the tarball. However, I noticed 220.127.116.11 on the ftp site,
> and the problem does not occur here. So perhaps it has silently
> disappeared between .0 and .1.
Some crashes were in fact fixed here. I think in fact the crypt/shadow
auth was broken in .0, is this what gentoo uses? (If so, someone should poke
them to upgrade to PAM, because for all it's flaws, PAM is better then
I actually didn't yet announce the .1 tarball I just made it to get into the
beta 1 gnome release. There will be a new tarball soon anyhow with changable
George <jirka 5z com>
If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.
-- Albert Einstein
] [Thread Prev