Re: GConf in Debian Sarge
- From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Debian GNOME List <debian-gtk-gnome lists debian org>, Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>, gconf-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf in Debian Sarge
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 08:14:44 +0100
Hey,
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 20:53, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 14:01, Ross Burton wrote:
> > Firstly, we've a patch to gconfd[1] so that we can send a HUP signal to
> > force it to reload the configuration. This happens in the postinst
> > script of any GConf-using package, and means the user doesn't have to
> > kill gconfd before the schemas are applied (which is the cause of many
> > bug reports). The alternative is to send a TERM signal, but this is
> > rather evil.
>
> TERM should in fact work fine, and does as far as I know. gconfd is
> designed to be killable with impunity.
I discovered only yesterday that we're not syncing pending changes on
TERM. An ORBit assertion is being triggered before we get a chance to do
it. I should get that fixed today.
Cheers,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]