Re: automake & gconf

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:05:45PM -0800, Steven Jenkins wrote: 
> I can work around it--I just want to understand what the right answer 
> should be. On a system with a properly installed gconf, should there 
> always be an executable called gconftool? If so, then it's easy to fix 
> with a symlink. If not, then AM_GCONF_SOURCE needs to make configure 
> look for alternate names.

I think I would say there should not be a symlink, the macro should
use the versioned gconftool. That's how CVS HEAD seems to work, also.

Havoc