Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- Cc: gconf-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 00:14:42 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Sander Vesik wrote:
> Uhhh... No. In fact, recompiled programs (or programs staticly linked
> against a modified gconf) are totally out of the scope of what a standard
> coniguration library should provide.
>
> Enforcing the use of known good libraries/programs is a totally separate
> issue.
Yes, I agree -- and this is why I think we shouldn't implement
restrictions that can be easily circumvented by recompiling an
application.
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
M)egszakít, Ú)jrapróbálkozik, B)eavatkozik egy kalapáccsal
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]