Re: remote configuration sources
- From: Bob Smith <bob thestuff net>
- To: "Kenneth Lierman Jr." <kliermanm bigfoot com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, <gconf-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: remote configuration sources
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:09:32 -0400 (EDT)
If I remember correctly (2 year old knowlege), what acap was addressing
there was the inability to add schema information on the fly through the
LDAP protocol. This would not be a problem for common things like
bookmarks and addressbooks. You can easily add any data you want provided
there is a data type already defined which is a simple copy of the schema
file into a directory if I remember correctly.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Kenneth Lierman Jr. wrote:
> > I think the core gconf
> > people need to deside what constitutes configuration data and what
> > constitutes user data, and if both should be supported in gconf. If you
> > want both, my suggestion is to look over LDAP closly and see if it would
> > suit your needs (I think it would), find a server that would work (I dont
> > know any easy to install ones so one might need to be created) and go from
> > there.
> >
>
> i would agree that in general the core gconf people need to make that
> decision.
>
> I did just see an acap doc that compared it to a bunch of existing
> protocols.... and ldap was included. There was a bunch of overlap, but
> their primary beef with ldap was that it's all administrator setup, so
> clients can't really add/modify data, which is obviously important for the
> applications i was talking about. Do a search for acap-vs-others.html and
> you should find that document....
>
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> gconf-list mailing list
> gconf-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gconf-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]