Re: ldap again.

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

monkeyiq dingoblue net au writes:
>     is the key of
> /something//misseddir/key
>     allowed in gconf? it just makes the ldap harder, because at the
> moment I split the name into a dn=something, dn=misseddir etc.
> 
> so it makes no sense if the user can have a key without each dir
> name in it. Does gconf engine check this, or should each backend?
> 

It's not allowed - GConf should check this before the backend gets
it. In the backend you can assume that keys are valid.

Havoc