Re: GARNOME status?

[Karsten Bräckelmann <guenther rudersport de>]

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 20:20 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> It seems there hasn't been any 2.25 GARNOME release. Is GARNOME still
> alive? Just wondering because we're mentioning it in our announements...

/me hangs his head in shame

Indeed, sorry about that. As David mentioned, I've been busy -- also
missing my co-maintainer and build machines...

Mar 18 is quite unlikely IMHO, since there's a lot more than simply
bumping versions. However, seeing some synergy and offers (Thanks! :-)
only within a few hours is encouraging! I'd be happy to get GARNOME up
to speed again soon-ish, with some more man-power -- though more likely
after the upcoming dot zero release.

I do agree that GARNOME at this point shouldn't be mentioned prominently
in the release announcements, since it isn't an option to build GNOME
right now. Maybe adjust to "coming soon" instead. I'll think about the
future the next days.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}