RE: Gnome 2.14.1 up & running except.........
- From: "Martin Ward" <Martin Ward tsubaki co uk>
- To: "Pat Suwalski" <pat suwalski net>
- Cc: garnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Gnome 2.14.1 up & running except.........
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:31:33 +0100
Pat,
I thought I understood what was happening there, but I've added the ld library path into ld.so.conf and it makes no difference. In fact none of the path entries in /etc/ld.do.conf or the includes in /etc/ld.conf.d/ seem to active.
Easiest way round my problem is just to go up to FC5 I think.
Regards,
Martin Ward
IT Manager
Tsubakimoto UK Ltd.
Nottingham NG15 0DX
UK England
Tel nr. [+44 | 0] 1623 688761
Fax nr. [+44 | 0] 1623 688789
email: martin ward tsubaki co uk
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Suwalski [mailto:pat suwalski net]
Sent: 24 May 2006 15:21
To: Martin Ward
Cc: garnome-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Gnome 2.14.1 up & running except.........
If you can, just use your /etc/ld.so.conf as a workaround.
--Pat
Martin Ward wrote:
> Pat,
>
> Seems we're stuck with it in FC4:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164869
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin Ward
>
> Tsubakimoto UK Ltd.
> email: martin ward tsubaki co uk
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Suwalski [mailto:pat suwalski net]
> Sent: 23 May 2006 17:01
> To: Martin Ward
> Cc: garnome-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: Gnome 2.14.1 up & running except.........
>
> Martin Ward wrote:
>> The alleged missing objects are there in GARHOME/lib - tried adding
>> this to PATH but no help. Also tried rebuilding yelp and eog, they
>> compile file. Is it perhaps the lib-----so--.0.0 execs. That are
>> missing something? Any ideas anyone ?
>
> There's your problem right there. You need them in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, not $PATH.
>
> --Pat
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.0/346 - Release Date: 23/05/06
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]