Re: GARNOME 2.9.91

[Bob Kashani <bobk ocf berkeley edu>]

Thanks Guenther...Paul fixed all of these issues in patch-53. :-)

Bob

On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:39 +0100, guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 22:02 +1100, Paul Drain wrote:
> > GARNOME 2.10 Beta 2
> > ===================
> > (the 'the beagle's back' release.)
> 
> First quick updates to GARNOME 2.10 Beta 2
> ==========================================
> (the 'he who breaks my build, goes back to the house of pain' [1] release)
> 
> Blah, yet another tarball that is broken out of the box. Paul, if you
> want guinea pigs before a tarball release, there are at least 2 of 'em
> hanging out on IRC most of the time. "You know, who you are." Don't we,
> Bob? ;-)
> 
> The issues with GARNOME 2.9.91 aka 2.10 Beta 2, which is patch-52 in
> arch land. Confused, anyone? ;)
> 
> * desktop/bug-buddy depends on desktop/gnome-menus. A fact the LIBDEPS
>   don't reflect, thus breaking the unattended build.
> 
> * desktop/nautilus: As Jeremiah and Joseph already discussed, the
>   gar-base.diff file seems to be old. 2 of 3 patches fail to get
>   applied.
> 
> * bindings/gtkmm has the wrong md5sum. According to
>   http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gtkmm/2.5/gtkmm-2.5.5.md5sum
>   it is '80babe692a8b59e62e68af28ea2f3ed1'.
> 
> What's up with the build monkeys? Anyway, that's it for now...
> 
> ...guenther
> 
> 
> [1]  Initially, I pondered naming this update 'ain't life a bitch' [2],
> but I decided to drop the movie quote in favor of some slightly adjusted
> song lyrics... (Does anyone recall either of 'em? ;)
> 
> [2]  Which is how I feel, right now -- but that ain't nothing to do with
> Garnome.
> 
> 
> -- 
> char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
> 
-- 
Bob Kashani
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~bobk/garnome