Re: GARNOME 2.9.91
- From: guenther <guenther rudersport de>
- To: pd cipherfunk org
- Cc: garnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GARNOME 2.9.91
- Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:39:06 +0100
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 22:02 +1100, Paul Drain wrote:
> GARNOME 2.10 Beta 2
> ===================
> (the 'the beagle's back' release.)
First quick updates to GARNOME 2.10 Beta 2
==========================================
(the 'he who breaks my build, goes back to the house of pain' [1] release)
Blah, yet another tarball that is broken out of the box. Paul, if you
want guinea pigs before a tarball release, there are at least 2 of 'em
hanging out on IRC most of the time. "You know, who you are." Don't we,
Bob? ;-)
The issues with GARNOME 2.9.91 aka 2.10 Beta 2, which is patch-52 in
arch land. Confused, anyone? ;)
* desktop/bug-buddy depends on desktop/gnome-menus. A fact the LIBDEPS
don't reflect, thus breaking the unattended build.
* desktop/nautilus: As Jeremiah and Joseph already discussed, the
gar-base.diff file seems to be old. 2 of 3 patches fail to get
applied.
* bindings/gtkmm has the wrong md5sum. According to
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/gtkmm/2.5/gtkmm-2.5.5.md5sum
it is '80babe692a8b59e62e68af28ea2f3ed1'.
What's up with the build monkeys? Anyway, that's it for now...
...guenther
[1] Initially, I pondered naming this update 'ain't life a bitch' [2],
but I decided to drop the movie quote in favor of some slightly adjusted
song lyrics... (Does anyone recall either of 'em? ;)
[2] Which is how I feel, right now -- but that ain't nothing to do with
Garnome.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0 ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]