Re: [Bug 325193] New: Stripping of binaries



On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:34:10 +0100
Mark Rosenstand <mark borkware net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 22:22 -0700, Myles Green wrote:
> > You wrote:
> > Anyway, the gmake porting of it is so ugly that I'd be embarrassed
> > to show it. It would be nice if someone could do it properly.
> > 
> > As you know, garnome is a volunteer effort, if you have some patches
> > please feel free to contribute them. If you can't supply patches or
> > aren't willing to volunteer your time to implement this then
> > comments like you made are completely unnecessary and just plain
> > rude. We need contributors not 1337 types, so put up (your patches)
> > or shut up.
> > 
> > Some people.... :-/
> 
> Thanks for the great feedback. While I really appreciate your positive
> attitude and apparently contributions, I would like to point out that
> the bug was filed with severity "enhancement" on request from someone
> who matters.
> 
> The link suggested a way to implement this apparently (did you ever
> read gar.mk?) missing feature, so I thought it'd be worth to point
> out.
> 
> I don't use GARNOME myself - I hang out in #garnome because of
> interest in GAR.
> 
> > (I'll bet that his email address is bogus but who knows)
> 
> I wish it was if these are the comments you get. GNOME (and especially
> GARNOME) is all about love, dude. Show us some :-)

Well, I do use garnome and have given some feedback but I wasn't nearly
as negative as you were - or did you think that was _positive_
feedback? From your comments I somehow got the idea you thought it was
an ugly hack. I also got the idea that you figured you could do a
better job, so I ask again where are your patches? As for reading
gar.mk, no, not in it's entirety. So what? My point was and still is
that you did not need to be so negative or rude. Why don't *you* show
the developers some love? C'mon dude, I know you can do it. :-)

If I've come on a little too strong tonight it's only because I've seen
three posts on as many different mailing lists that came across like
some smart-ass who figured that the work done on some very worthwhile
projects was all wrong and only they knew how it should be done. Oh and
not one of the three posters bothered to attach any patches. I'll be
the first one to admit that I am _not_ a programmer so the best I'll
ever be able to to is test and give 99.999% guaranteed friendly, usable
feedback.

Anyway, this is a waste of peoples bandwidth here on the list so if you
wish to carry this on Mark I suggest we take this off-list.

Regards, Myles
-- 
You will be recognized and honored as a community leader.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]