Re: [GARNOME via arch]
- From: Frank Lynch <frank iona com>
- To: garnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GARNOME via arch]
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:11:51 -0400
I just did a:
grep -i -n "is_finished_loading" `find . -name *.h`
looking for a definition for this is_finished_loading member in a
header, and it was no-where to be found, so I just commented out the
problem line of code, my build continues... I just hope that I haven't
broken anything by doing this.
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 13:32, Frank Lynch wrote:
> I'm getting the following compile failure while trying to build the
> gnome file chooser via arch:
>
> cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -pthread -DORBIT2=1
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/gtk-2.0
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/lib/gtk-2.0/include
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/atk-1.0
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include
> -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/lib/glib-2.0/include
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/gnome-vfs-2.0
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/bonobo-activation-2.0
> -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include/orbit-2.0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
> -DDATADIR=\"/usr/local/gnome2.6/share\" -DPREFIX=\"/usr/local/gnome2.6\"
> -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/gnome2.6/lib\"
> -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/gnome2.6/etc\" -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -I/usr/local/gnome2.6/include
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/usr/local/gnome2.6/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -O2
> -pipe -c gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
> .libs/gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.o
> gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.c: In function
> `gtk_file_folder_gnome_vfs_iface_init':
> gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.c:1765: structure has no member named
> `is_finished_loading'
> make[5]: *** [gtkfilesystemgnomevfs.lo] Error 1
>
> BTW In my gar.conf.mk I have set:
> main_prefix ?= /usr/local/gnome2.6
> earlier this month I installed using garnome 2.5.92 into the same
> target.. could there be a conflict? should I try to install to a
> different location?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]