Re: Should GARNOME always build Mozilla?

[Cedric Marcone <marcone mdeo fr>]

Good point Jeff ;)

But ... gtk+ integation gets better and better at every release and the
new GRE is kind of interesting as well (in term of epiphany integration)
and that seems to be important from a gnome-desktop point of view.

Thank you, 

Waiting for your votes guys !!!


On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 09:07, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Cedric Marcone">
> 
> > As a testing plateforme garnome should always provide, as a default, the
> > newer technology. Tweakers and testers should have enough knowledge to
> > comment a dependency in a Makefile... 
> > 
> > I vote against this. Garnome should always give us the most recent
> > technology. And we should be in charge of adapting what it gives to us,
> > depending on our needs.
> 
> But testing Mozilla is not a primary objective of GARNOME testers... The
> GNOME browsers are targeting 1.4 as the 'stable' Mozilla at the moment, so
> it doesn't make a lot of sense for us to be testing against 1.5.
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> -- 
> linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia         http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
>  
>     "Basically my philosophy on release management is that it should be
>                 like police brutality." - Maciej Stachowiak