just built garnome on Debian Woody...



Hi!

Thanks all people for Garnome!

I'm not a programmer, I just dared to try it... My first try building it ended some monthes ago in some error I couldn't manage to solve. Well, now it took 3 days for me, (3 nights actually :) I have solved lots of troubles, mostly by searching this list for errors that somebody yet solved. Thanks once more, your postings were useful.

I now stopped at Epiphany compiling. The problem is that I have Mozilla 1.5 sources, not 1.5b. And I don't want to go back to 1.5b. I decided to do a trick and change md5sum and package name in mozilla directory of garnome, and that worked, mozilla 1.5 compiled. But then Epiphany configuration script said it needs only 1.5b. I downloaded the most recent Epiphany 1.1.0 from its homepage in hope that it depends on recent mozilla, but it wanted fresh gtk+, more recent that garnome built. I stopped at this point because the desktop environment works and more changes are too difficult for me. Maybe I'll try to comment out the Epiphany instead of doing big library upgrade.

Though I'm not a programmer, I would recommend developers some things:
- It would be very useful to have a full list of downloads that garnome perform, just to have possibility to download all packages somewhere and take it home to build, for people like me who don't have fast connection at home. - pay more attention to define the compiler version at the very beginning of compilation. Maybe it would be useful to do some global configuration pre-search just for compilers and libraries needed for the whole meta-desktop to build ? I faced the problem that I have to get new compiler and libraries somewhere in the middle of compilation process, because standard (for woody) gcc just couldn't compile it. - When the compilation stopped because of lack in ncurses-devel package (my fault, of course, but - ) it couldn't resume compiling after the package was installed, so I couldn't do anything but start compilation from zero point. Maybe you should do something with this in the distribution. All other missing headers didn't produce such a trouble, the compilation could be resumed after the needed package is installed.

The aim of my posting is mostly to thank you all, just for you to know that there's another copy of it running, not to bother you with minor troubles, so you can do nothing with this :)

Denis.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]