Hi! > I will just be frank here... > • Translation shifting from upstream to downstream ? > • Development infrastructure limiting upstream contribution. > • Canonical's Unity development, what does it mean for GNOME ? > • Red Hat's control over GNOME Shell ? > • Meego being a competition or a GNOME sister project ? > • Smaller companies involvement into GNOME decisions > • How much of GNOME is community driven and how much is company driven > • Is the GNOME community forced to assimilate with decisions made by > those companies? > • More... OK, you were asked to list them. Anyway, why do you think there are true? * From my point of view as part of the gtp coordination team I think translations are not shifting downstream, we rather solved most of these problems and have high-quality upstream translations. * Why do you think our infrastructure is limiting? * For the company statements IMHO despite I don't know anything about the Unity plans I think those arent' true. Could you explain? Thanks, Johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part