Re: OOXML [was Re: GNOME Foundation Board Meeting Minutes :: 7/6/07]
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: OOXML [was Re: GNOME Foundation Board Meeting Minutes :: 7/6/07]
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 06:53:49 -0400
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 07:08:30PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Here's something IBM's Rob Weir said about what ECMA is doing now:
> robert_weir us ibm com
>
> The practical difficulty here is that of timing. While I have no doubt
> that Jody was instrumental in getting additional technical disclosures
> from Microsoft back in 2006, Ecma TC45 is not in that mode of operation
> right now. The OOXML standard Ecma 376 has already been approved by
> Ecma. It is now before JTC1 as DIS 29500 and the text is essentially
> frozen since December 2006. The only changes that can be made to it
> must be in response to specific JTC1 national body ballot comments.
> Jody can no longer go to a TC45 meeting and say, "Gee, I'd like more
> information added on X, Y and Z". JTC1 rules forbid changes to the
> standard that are not traceable to a national body comment.
>
> Certainly, Jody or any other Ecma TC45 member so inclined can help
> Microsoft address the thousands of ISO comments that were received, and
> help prep OOXML for approval by JTC1. There is certainly a lot of grunt
> work to be done there. But let's not call that anything but what it is
> -- helping Microsoft gain ISO approval.
>
> If this is accurate, then it is impossible for participation in ECMA
> _today_ to serve the goal which has been presented here as the motive
> for GNOME's membership.
That is partially true, Which is why I am not participating
currently. It was not true in the run up to the ISO fast track
vote, when the ECMA TC was still reviewing issue that Novell and I
had reported, that they will submit at the BRM with the same
standing as a national body.
> This means it might be useful to keep the GNOME Foundation ECMA
> membership open for future work. But Jody should not help with the
> current activity, because that activity can only do harm.
That is a reasonable characterization of my current role.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]