Re: Code Of Conduct
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Code Of Conduct
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:05:36 +1000
<quote who="Quim Gil">
> I think GNOME would be a less exciting place with a Code of Conduct.
8< snip 8<
> > Here's a simple start: http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
>
> Isn't this just common sense? I don't see the need to push a long debate
> to end up having a list of points based on common sense.
So, does common sense make things less exciting?
> If we want to promote specific sectors or goals, let's promote them. A
> Code of Conduct is not useful for that, apart from the rhetoric.
I agree that a CoC is not necessarily something that will *actively* help
with outreach to the groups that Murray suggested, but it is an extremely
useful statement nonetheless.
I guess I'll just fall back on the evidence as I've seen it - the Ubuntu
Code of Conduct has communicated a very strong statement of intent, and
ensured (not "made" but "ensured") that the Ubuntu community is a great
place to be.
But cf. my email about why GNOME people stick around - I totally object to
the suggestions that a Code of Conduct is only needed in desperate times.
That's poppycock.
- Jeff
--
GUADEC 2006: Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain http://2006.guadec.org/
"jwz? no way man, he's my idle" - James Wilkinson
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]