Re: [Off Topic] We need "Vendor"s? [was Words to Avoid "Vendor"]
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: rms gnu org
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Off Topic] We need "Vendor"s? [was Words to Avoid "Vendor"]
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:37:39 +0100
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 21:06 -0500, Richard M. Stallman wrote:
> > We want to encourage non-free apps to use GNOME, but we don't want to
> > appear to grant those non-free apps ethical legitimacy. We have to
> > choose our words with care to achieve both goals at once.
>
> These are your priorities. Other people have other priorities, though they
> have the same aims. It's a difference of strategy, not of ideology.
>
> I think it is a difference of values.
I resent the implication. You can't label people as immoral just because
they don't blindly agree with you on every little thing.
> Not everyone involved with GNOME
> thinks that free vs proprietary software is a matter of right vs wrong.
>
> That is precisely why I'm looking for like-minded candidates to
> endorse for the board.
Luckily, I don't believe any of the candidates share your ridiculous
extremist self-belief.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]