Re: [GNOME-India] Re: Request for permission for Logo usage
- From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <paivakil vsnl net>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, foundation-list gnome org, gnome-in-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GNOME-India] Re: Request for permission for Logo usage
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:31:41 +0530
Hi!! I have volunteered for building the pages for the gnime-in pages.
Syamindu's mail on the TM issue was result of a private discussion we
had about use of the GNOME foot logo on our pages.
The footer at www.gnome.org says `GNOME and the foot logo are
trademarks of the GNOME Foundation' which is what prompted me to raise
the issue.
All I wanted was to use the foot logo as an icon on the page. Now, I
realise that I have raised a hornet's nest. ;(
Alan Cox said on Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 02:19:40AM +0000,:
> Or perhaps the release team should pull all the packages using the
> gnome foot since there are no guidelines for its use.. games etc.
That is, IMHO, a serious bug in the logo usage policy.
> Certainly a release of a final 2.6 containing them built into GPL
> packages would be the end of a plausible trademark claim imho. (Yes
> there are reasons vendors keep their logo packages seperate!)
Definitely yes.
And I am worried that people may create forks independent of GNOME
(which is perfectly alright under the copyright law) call the fork
`GNOME', and then use the Gnome trademark for the unofficial fork.
Such unauthorised use of the trademark can, apart from diluting
trademark protection itself, can negate effects of the disclaimer of
warranty clauses(*).
I think Gnome has a lesson to learn from SPI and Debian on this
issue. Debian has two logos - one the `swirl' by itself, and another
the `swirl above a bottle'. The latter is trademarked, and is not
distributed in Debian main. Only the Debian Developers are allowed to
use the bottle+swirl logo(1). OTOH, the swirl logo comes with a very
liberal license(2). Details are at www.debian.org/logos/
Foot Notes:-
(*) I have seen lawyers in the US paranoid about `disclaimer'
provisions. Hence the issue.
1. The license for the swirl logo is:-
Debian Open Use Logo License
Copyright (c) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to
the Debian project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project.
Note: we would appreciate that you make the image a link to
http://www.debian.org/ if you use it on a web page.
2. License for the swirl+bottle logo is:-
Debian Official Use Logo License
Copyright (c) 1999 Software in the Public Interest
1. This logo may only be used if:
* the product it is used for is made using a documented
procedure as published on www.debian.org (for example official
CD-creation)
* official approval is given by Debian for its use in this
purpose
2. May be used if an official part of debian (decided using the
rules in I) is part of the complete product, if it is made clear
that only this part is officially approved
3. We reserve the right to revoke a license for a product
Permission has been given to use the official logo on clothing
(shirts, hats, etc) as long as they are made by a Debian developer and
not sold for profit.
Neither license fits our purpose squarely.
--
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Mahesh T. Pai, LL.M.,
'NANDINI', S. R. M. Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin-682018,
Kerala, India.
http://in.geocities.com/paivakil
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]