Re: Bounty hunt, round 2.
- From: linas linas org (Linas Vepstas)
- To: Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- Cc: Nat Friedman <nat novell com>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Bounty hunt, round 2.
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:45:17 -0500
Hi,
I was out on vacation, and in reading this thread, I never saw a
resolution. How'd this all come out in the end?
--linas
p.s. I agree with RMS; If a company such as Novell needs an agent,
then maybe OSDL might be a better venue? OSDL seems well-structured
to handle such things.
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:21:27PM -0400, Richard Stallman was heard to remark:
> Novell is funding the GNOME bounties, not the foundation. We are paying
> the foundation a small administration fee to handle paying out the
> bounties; this is a pretty standard practice in non profits, it's
> something the GNOME foundation has done before for other people, and it
> was approved by the board last year.
>
> It is proper for GNOME Foundation to accept funds from whomever so
> that it can hand out bounties to promote its work on GNOME. However,
> the way you're describing it, the GNOME Foundation is handling these
> bounties on behalf Novell. That's not proper--it should not happen.
> The GNOME Foundation of course accepts contributions towards the goal
> of developing GNOME, but it shouldn't let itself become the agent of a
> company, shouldn't let the company get in the driver's seat.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
--
pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <linas linas org>
PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984 3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]