Re: Questions
- From: Xavier Bestel <n0made free fr>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: Linas Vepstas <linas linas org>, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>, Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>, on_the_net clear net nz, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Questions
- Date: 27 Nov 2001 11:39:20 +0100
le mar 27-11-2001 à 11:08, Alan Cox a écrit :
> > May I add that, without RMS 'lauching' the GNOME project and harassing
> > TrollTech, Qt would probably never have been licenced under the GPL ?
>
> Had the license not changed Qt would have been replaced by Harmony.
Do you think KDE people were really concerned with the non-free aspect
of Qt ? I'm not so sure, but I may be wrong. OTOH I wouldn't like GNOME
people to become licence-agnostic "because it pleases our sponsors".
Xav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
