Re: Questions
- From: Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- To: jg pa dec com
- Cc: jg pa dec com, n0made free fr, alan lxorguk ukuu org uk, linas linas org, veillard redhat com, on_the_net clear net nz, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Questions
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 02:48:23 -0700 (MST)
Of course, most of my work is currently in the X server: we won't accept
GPL there under any circumstances, due to its "infectious" behavior.
The idea that the GPL is "infectious" or works "like a virus" is a
very colorful way to express a common misconception about the GPL.
The GPL does not "spread" by mere proximity, the way a virus does. It
spreads by transplantation and combination of code: if you copy some
GPL-covered code into your program, the GPL comes with it.
So if you want to be accurate, it is better to say that the GPL is
like a rhododendron. Strangely, though, I rarely see anyone say that.
Comparing something with a virus or an infection, even with
scare-quotes, is a very harsh criticism. If you say that the license
used by most GNU software, and in particular by most of GNOME, is like
a virus or an infection, that is not good PR for GNOME. Please try to
avoid that.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]