Re: Foundation summary
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: hp redhat com (Havoc Pennington), bart eazel com,foundation-list gnome org, gcorrin eazel com (Greg Corrin)
- Subject: Re: Foundation summary
- Date: 27 Jul 2000 21:37:56 -0700
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> > some statement of the general intent of the foundation. The election
> > of the board and approval of the bylaws are both after LWE.
>
> We shall see. And if I stand for its dissolution and lose then the whole
> foundation is vindicated in its existance. Which is good
>
Since boards have to run as a slate, you'd have to find at least 6
other people who agree to run with you.
However, I would like to discourage you from doing this. We are trying
to find a better way to organize our project to meet a number of needs
that aren't being met by the current structure, and instead of
providing constructive suggestions, you are just threatening to be a
spoiler. I don't think that's a fair way to proceed.
I did think we were rushing things, but the current plan of action
assuages the worries I had.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]