Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.

Rusty Conover <> writes: 
> I think 11 would be on the low end with 15 being a better number to
> get an accurate representation of the GNOME population.  With small
> board membership it turns into more of a popularity contest rather
> then a functional organization with people motivated to be on the
> board rather then just winning elections.

15 won't get anything done without parliamentary procedure. There's no
question there. Far too big.

11 is the absolute max. As Alan says 7 would maybe be most productive,
but 9 is a reasonable compromise since one or two people are often


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]