Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Rusty Conover <rconover@zootweb.com> writes: 
> I think 11 would be on the low end with 15 being a better number to
> get an accurate representation of the GNOME population.  With small
> board membership it turns into more of a popularity contest rather
> then a functional organization with people motivated to be on the
> board rather then just winning elections.
>

15 won't get anything done without parliamentary procedure. There's no
question there. Far too big.

11 is the absolute max. As Alan says 7 would maybe be most productive,
but 9 is a reasonable compromise since one or two people are often
absent.

Havoc