Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- From: Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>
- To: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 22:41:59 -0700
Nat Friedman wrote:
> > "virtual global entity" == "no actual legal existence"?
>
> Right. This was what Bart proposed. It would be represented locally
> by national GNOME foundation points of presence. These would be used
> whenever a legal entity in a given jurisdiction is needed: for the
> transfer of funds, for example.
>
> It does sound a little crazy, I know. Bart?
I think the apparent craziness stems from the way you were trying to fold
everything into one decision-make structure. By separating out the technical
decision-making from other functions, as was disccused later today, the
virtual global entity makes sense again. Then again, that solution received
some negative feedback when I first suggested it.
bd
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]