Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- From: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>
- To: George <jirka 5z com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>, foundation-list gnome org,rms gnu org
- Subject: Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- Date: 13 Jul 2000 18:04:10 -0400
George <jirka@5z.com> writes:
> I think that's the exact point. A recall is a much more drastic meassure
> then voting on an issue. And thus this would reserve referendum only for
> cases where not recalling the board would be seen as more disasterous then
> recalling it.
I'm with you on this one.
> > Yeah, but how do you do a release if the module maintainers aren't
> > going to cooperate?
>
> I don't think you need to make this official. It just works this way.
Yeah, I just felt like I had to write something down about it since I
made a section header for it, and it was sort of a pain to renumber
all the sections. So I just ended up writing down what effectively
happens now.
Nat
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]