Re: Apache dual licensing?
- From: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- To: harinath cs umn edu (Raja R Harinath)
- Cc: alan lxorguk ukuu org uk (Alan Cox),brian collab net (Brian Behlendorf), atai atai org,foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Apache dual licensing?
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:02:18 +0100 (BST)
> is _stricter_ than (2.a) of the GPL, and thus wouldn't satisfy "no
> additional requirements". Is this what you mean when you say "don't
> agree", or do you disagree with the connection between those clauses?
I disagree that they are compatible
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]