Re: Apache dual licensing?

[Raja R Harinath <harinath cs umn edu>]

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> Raja R Harinath <harinath@cs.umn.edu> writes:
> > > The GPL has a similar requirement.
> > 
> > To clarify, I read the above requirement to be a special case of
> > clause (2.a) of the GPL.
> 
> Ok I see the reasoning. I dont agree with it.

On further thought, given my reasoning above: the Apache requirement
is _stricter_ than (2.a) of the GPL, and thus wouldn't satisfy "no
additional requirements".  Is this what you mean when you say "don't
agree", or do you disagree with the connection between those clauses?

- Hari
-- 
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions."      -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing."   -- Roy L Ash