Re: Time reported +4 hours with Nikon D40
- From: Chris Kelly <ckdake ckdake com>
- To: f-spot-list <f-spot-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Time reported +4 hours with Nikon D40
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 10:10:44 -0400
Other option is to let it keep writing metadata so you get to keep your
tags in your files, and use jhead to go in and fix the EXIF info before
you upload the images somewhere (or once fspot is fixed).
I wrote an example script here: http://ckdake.com/node/225
-Chris
Pat Suwalski wrote:
We've had a big thread on this last month:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/f-spot-list/2008-April/msg00047.html
The short of it is that the time management in f-spot is really, really
broken. I suggest you disable writing metadata to the photos until this
is resolved.
--Pat
Todd Slater wrote:
Apologies for not providing details: f-spot 0.4.2 on Ubuntu 8.04,
write metadata to file enabled.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Todd Slater <dontodd gmail com> wrote:
Stimulus check, new camera.
When I import photos taken with a Nikon D40, the DateTimeOriginal is 4
hours later than the time I took the picture, which according to the
Metadata Browser is accurately reflected by the DateTimeDigitized. I
read the thread here
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/f-spot-list/2005-August/msg00076.html.
It seems that in my case DateTimeOriginal and DateTimeDigitized should
be the same. Is it the camera or f-spot that is causing this
confusion, and is there a solution to get f-spot to display the
correct time?
Thanks for any tips,
Todd
_______________________________________________
F-spot-list mailing list
F-spot-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
_______________________________________________
F-spot-list mailing list
F-spot-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]