Support for color profiles?
- From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt burggraben net>
- To: f-spot-list gnome org
- Subject: Support for color profiles?
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:53:53 +0100
Hi,
Is there any ongoing work for supporting color profiles in f-spot?
I'm aware there's some code in src/Imaging/, but I already learned
it does "not enough".
Things I'd like to see:
- support for embedded color (ICC) profiles as per JFIF or Exif 2.2
and for files using AdobeRGB as per Exif 2.21/DCF 2.0 when viewing
files.
- conversion from the profiles named above to sRGB when exporting
(optional, so you can use sRGB for web galleries, photo sharing
sites etc and the native color space of the file whenever needed).
This obviously does not result in a "color managed workflow" but
will help dealing with color profiled images.
I'm willing to help coding and testing, but I did not want to
duplicate work already done. Can someone of the developers
tell me which parts of the color profile code is working?
Below I have compiled some points about color profiles and
file formats, in random order, for those who didn't already
dive into the gory details (sorry, it's a little lengthy):
- Do not expect to get a "color managed workflow" and such by
just having those profile thingies around.
- The two most important color spaces today are sRGB and AdobeRGB.
The former was supposed to be a "good guess" for most monitors
(roughly speaking) when it was designed, the latter was designed
by Adobe as enhanced "working color space" for preprint stages.
It has a somewhat better color reproduction in cyan and green
areas.
- A lot of software does not handle color profiles, but just
assumes sRGB on all images. This includes all major web browsers
except Apple Safari (and perhaps the upcoming Firefox 3)
and even a lot of image viewers (gqview-devel 2.1.5 does
support embedded profiles, but not Exif 2.21 as explained below;
additionally, gqview development seems dormant). Gimp 2.4
supports color profiles, but not Exif 2.21.
For this reason images to be posted on the web should be in
sRGB color space.
- If files recorded in AdobeRGB are viewed as sRGB files (without
conversion), colors look very dull and grey.
- Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as a "JPEG file".
Today, whe have JFIF (JPEG File Interchange Format) and
Exif (Exchangeable Image File Format). The former does always
and the latter does often carry their "payload" (the image)
as JPEG compressed data. According to the papers, they require
slightly different metadata handling (almost(?) every application
does handle both file types just fine transparently to the user).
- if a (newer than 2003) camera records in AdobeRGB, it will
hopefully do so in compliance with Exif 2.21/DCF 2.0. Exif 2.21
is an update to the widely known and used Exif 2.2 standard.
The most important part of the update (at least for this case)
is the support for color spaces besides sRGB and "uncalibrated".
So, if the Exif version of an photo file is 2.21 (0x0221 in tag
0x9000 ExifVersion in APP1), it may have an color space of
"uncalibrated" (0xFFFF in tag 0xA001 ColorSpace in APP1 (Exif))
and the string "R03" in Exif.Iop.InteropIndex (that's tag 0x001
in the APP1 section), which marks it as a "DCF option file" with
AdobeRGB color space. An sRGB file has 0x0001 in ColorSpace and
"R98" in InteroperabilityIndex) and is called a "DCF normal
file". Also, a "DCF option file" is supposed to have an underscore
as the first character of it's file name (for example "_mg_1234.jpg"
when using Canon gear).
The string "R03" is not defined in Exif 2.2 but only in Exif 2.21.
- Some software indicated the use of AdobeRGB on Exif 2.2 files by
putting 0x0002 into Exif.Photo.ColorSpace. This is not covered by
the standard, and (hopefully) not to common.
The "right way" to indicate color profiles besides sRGB in Exif 2.2
is to set Exif.Photo.ColorSpace to "uncalibrated" and supply the
profile in Exif.Photo.ICC_Profile (the profile itself is stored in
an APP2 section).
- Files created by other software (Gimp, Photoshop) will be in JFIF
format can carry an embedded profile in an APP2 section, but there
are no "real Exif tags".
- For correctly interpreting "DCF option files" with AdobeRGB color
space one needs to have the AdobeRGB profile around. You can download
these at http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/adobergb.html but I think
their license is too tight for including the profile in open source
software. Alternatives are using a homebrewed profile "compatible
with Adobe RGB (1998)" (I think I've seen one in src/Imaging/Tiff.cs)
or instructing the user to download a profile on his own. There
have been suggestions from the OpenICC project to put color
profiles in /usr/share/color/icc/, /usr/local/share/color/icc/ or
~/.color/icc/.
- Some reading:
the exiftool documentation http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
the Exif 2.2 standard http://www.exif.org/specifications.html
a tutorial on color management basics
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/color-management1.htm
the most comprehensive freely available official source on
Exif 2.21/DCF 2.0 (no joking here)
http://www.cipa.jp/exifprint/contents_e/01exif2_2_e.html
Regards
Christoph
--
Spare Space
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]