Re: gentoo libexif.so.12 problem



John Russell wrote:
> Ah, outstanding.  I changed this to libexif.so.10 and everything is
> working great.  Thanks for the help.
> 
> John
> 
> On 10/25/05, Jens Ansorg <liste ja-web de> wrote:
> 
>>John Russell wrote:
>>
>>>While trying the 0.1.3 release of f-spot I ran in to the problem
>>>described in this post.
>>>
>>>http://mail.gnome.org/archives/f-spot-list/2005-October/msg00039.html
>>>
>>>missing libexif.so.12.
>>>
>>>The post acknowledges the problem, however, is there a way to make
>>>this work on Gentoo?  Thanks for the help.
>>>
>>>John
>>>

It's been fixed in the development ebuild for a bit. Find info on the
ebuild's development at this link

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45095

-- 
Doug Goldstein <cardoe gentoo org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]