On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 13:01 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 12:13 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > To show my intentions are good, because a lot people seem to actually > > question that, I will create a patch that contains all compilation > > warning fixes for Camel. > > > > Well, not immediately all of them because some of my work isn't easy to > > extract a patch for (because I have a few significant other changes in > > my copy too). I did the extra effort to include the compilation warnings that were at first not patchable caused by my own changes in this patch too. I indeed had to redo some of the fixes. This is a second version of the patch. Larger than the first one because this time more files in providers/ are also being patched. It looks like the first patch had a few compilation errors. Oeps. Fixed in this one of course. > This is the bug: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363384 Note: The configure script of e-d-s doesn't check for flex, yet flex is being used by the build. -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be blog: http://pvanhoof.be/blog
Attachment:
camel_compilation_warnings_2_.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data