Re: [evolution-patches] The differences between camel-lite and normal camel

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:12 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:

> Looking forward to seeing it. Consider putting your changes behind
> --enable-camel-lite (or --enable-eds-lite) defines. That is the right
> way to do it IMHO. It will then also be easier to put some configure
> magic in place if required to support an out-of-tree e-d-s branch.

Will do that.
 
> > Criticism is welcome. Off this list please.
> 
> Good luck.

Thanks a lot for this positive reaction. It has been hard to get any
such reaction for contributing to the Evolution project :(. From the
Novell team itself, you get mostly reactions like: you are being
agnostic and counterproductive, bla bla bla.


ps. I would hereby like to repeat my personal appreciation to the work
Matthew has been doing on libedataserver, Kjartan's work and Pavel's
work. I think especially these times it's difficult to keep believing in
the purpose of contributing to the many sub-projects of Evolution.
Nevertheless, I think, it's important that we keep doing that.


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be
blog: http://pvanhoof.be/blog