Re: [evolution-patches] New implementation of EMsgPort

[Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>]

On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:38 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I'm interested in changes like yours. Not because I want to make things
> more unstable (less tested) for tinymail ;), but because I believe some
> inner core parts of Camel have design problems and others are
> replaceable with excellent existing implementations in glib (like
> EMsgPort <-> GAsyncQueue, EMutex <-> GMutex, GThread <->  EThread and
> finally of course CamelObject <-> GObject).

Sounds good.  Speaking of which, see also:

Kill EMutex (with patches):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356177

Kill EThread (with patches):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362638

Kill CamelException (no patches yet):
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354075

I'd be very interested in seeing Camel become GObject-based.  Let me know if there's anything I can do to help.

Matt