Re: [evolution-patches] Patch for mail/calendar using the timestamps sent by the server in getQM messages [Groupwise backend]



I agree..just that i did not see the version number being checked/used
anywhere in the gw code so far.

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 11:13 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 10:04 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: 
> > hi,
> > 
> > Attached patch stores the time string retrieved from the server into
> > the camel summary and uses it to poll the server on the next getQM call.
> > [This patch leaves the gw summary version unchanged though it adds a new
> > property - as i have assumed that it can handle the absence of the
> > timestamp gracefully. fejj/partha - pl. confirm if this is safe].
> 
> No.  You have changed the format == version changed.  Bump the
> version, and make the file only load that value if the version is at
> least the new one.  So it can transparently read the old version
> still.  Write out only the new version though.
> 
> Although - given that groupwise is not released yet, it may not
> matter, if this only goes into 2.2 though you will need to do it.
> 
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]