Re: [evolution-patches] Patch for mail/calendar using the timestamps sent by the server in getQM messages [Groupwise backend]
- From: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Harish Krishnaswamy <harish krishnaswamy gmail com>, evolution-patches lists ximian com, pchenthill novell com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Patch for mail/calendar using the timestamps sent by the server in getQM messages [Groupwise backend]
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:32:04 +0530
I agree..just that i did not see the version number being checked/used
anywhere in the gw code so far.
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 11:13 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 10:04 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > Attached patch stores the time string retrieved from the server into
> > the camel summary and uses it to poll the server on the next getQM call.
> > [This patch leaves the gw summary version unchanged though it adds a new
> > property - as i have assumed that it can handle the absence of the
> > timestamp gracefully. fejj/partha - pl. confirm if this is safe].
>
> No. You have changed the format == version changed. Bump the
> version, and make the file only load that value if the version is at
> least the new one. So it can transparently read the old version
> still. Write out only the new version though.
>
> Although - given that groupwise is not released yet, it may not
> matter, if this only goes into 2.2 though you will need to do it.
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]