Re: [evolution-patches] Same as previous bug, only this hasn't been reported in bugzilla
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
- Cc: spamfrommailing freax org, Evolution Patches <evolution-patches lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Same as previous bug, only this hasn't been reported in bugzilla
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:25:44 -0500
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 19:13 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:48 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:24 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm doing this because it's being used for a function that's expecting
> > > a "char" pointer rather than a "gchar" pointer.
> > >
> > > Should I still use glib functions on non-glib types? Or should I use
> > > glib-types and cast them to non-glib types?
> > >
> > gchar and char are the same, in gtypes.h:
> >
> >
> > typedef char gchar;
>
> note that this needs gnome-i18n team approval, so please ask for it
> (gnome-i18n gnome org)
I believe the two patches should be reverted for now. Also, it should
probably be the responsibility of the maintainers to ask for these
approvals.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]