Re: [evolution-patches] 72876, empty reply-to confusing reply to mail

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>]

On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 09:42 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:41 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: 
> > looks good
> > 
> > is it on purpose that the behaviour of always clearing the from/reply_to
> > changed (in the case where there are no addresses to parse at least)?
> 
> Yes.  That code is to enforce a single-header presence, a good header
> followed by an empty one should just consider the good one.
> 

right, that's what I figured it was meant to do but it was a change in
behaviour (other than the bug being fixed) so I figured I'd make sure :)